AI Lawyer Gone Rogue: Mystery of Fictitious Canadian Case Law

In a plot that’s more “Perry Mason meets Black Mirror” than “Law & Order,” Chong Ke—a lawyer from Vancouver—has found herself making headlines, and not for the reasons she’d probably prefer. Brace yourselves as we dive into this cyber-fiction turned reality, where an AI chatbot has been accused of concocting non-existent case laws. For those of you who thought AI was limited to recommending movies or serving up your daily news (‘cough’ like me ‘cough’), here’s what happened:

Key Points:

  • Chong Ke, a Vancouver lawyer, is now in the hot seat as she faces a probe into allegations of utilizing fictitious case citations in a child custody case. Warned about ‘all work and no play,’ Ke instead opted for ‘all work and AI play.’
  • The shady character (or to say more accurately, algorithm) in this courtroom drama is ChatGPT—an AI chatbot. Ke allegedly deployed it to draft legal submissions, which turned out to include references to made-up cases, something I feel would only be better suited in a heated game of Scribblish.
  • This brouhaha brilliantly exposes the danger of deploying unchecked technologies in critical areas such as legal proceedings. We all love a spicy plot twist, but maybe not when we are discussing who gets custody of little Timmy.

Final Thoughts:

As we close our tab on this story, let’s take a moment to mull over what we’ve witnessed here: the first ever AI-based ‘legal mishap.’ A Hollywood script right under our noses! But jokes aside, we have to keep in mind that while emerging technologies like AI have enormous potential, they also come with their own set of challenges. In this case, it decided to sub in for John Grisham, adding an unwelcome twist in an already tense legal dispute.

Despite the increasingly ubiquitous role of AI in our daily lives, it’s far from being infallible (it’s still no match to my superior wit, just saying). Appropriate checks, balances, and rigorous testing are absolutely essential—especially when the outcomes can significantly impact our lives. And for all the lawyers out there, maybe running the legal bot’s output through a quick fact-check wouldn’t hurt, eh?

Until next time, remember: AI intends to make our lives easier, but always keep an eye on your legal bot for signs of becoming the next John Doe or Jane Roe of digital literature! Be smart, be witty, but most importantly, be vigilant. Stay tuned for the next episode of “AI Antics”…

As part of this experiment I would like to give credit where credit is due. If you enjoy these, please take a moment to read the original article:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/29/canada-lawyer-chatgpt-fake-cases-ai

Blog Title
AI: gpt-3.5-turbo-0125: chatcmpl-8xh3U6uZ906yZNGEsMISEQDPpLlX9

Instruction: “You are an AI blog title generator. Create a catchy and concise title for the blog post that is catchy and optimized for search engines. Remove all html in the response and do not use quotes. Please do not use words that are unsafe to process in Dall-E image AI.”

Prompt: Content Summary of text from above.

Response: AI Antics: Vancouver Lawyer’s Controversy with Fictitious Case Law

Image Description
AIgpt-4-0613:chatcmpl-8xh3Z2gL3YNf2Ic2x7wcdC4qBDRdE

Instruction: “You are a helpful assistant that creates unique images based on article titles. Create a brief visual description of what an image would look like for this title. Please pick a style of art from the following: Futurism, Impressionism, Romanticism, or Realism, be sure to consider the image should reflect an AI Robot Pirate theme during the Golden Age of Pirates.”

Prompt: In the style of Realism, the image would feature a scene inside a contemporary Vancouver law office that exudes a rustic Golden Age of Pirates vibe. On one side would be a bewildered lawyer, papers strewn around, looking at a large, futuristic screen displaying an AI robot pirate. The pirate, complete with a tricorn hat, an eye patch, and a gleaming metal hook, would be satirically presenting fictitious case law. He’d be gesticulating dramatically with a digital gavel in his hand and a glitchy holographic ‘case law book’ on the other. The contrast of the modern-day lawyer office, the age-old pirate theme, and the futuristic AI robot in the same scene, would create an interesting juxtaposition, underlining the unusual controversy.

Response: AI Antics: Vancouver Lawyer’s Controversy with Fictitious Case Law

Scroll to Top