Aussie Puts AI in the Naughty Corner: New Regs, Low Trust, and a Hefty GDP Boost
“Hold on to your kangaroos, ’cause the Australian government is putting its foot down – or, um, paw down – on risky AI products and asking for stricter regulations. It seems our robot overlords might be advancing faster than the lawmakers’ can scribble down their rules. Also, folks Down Under seems to trust AI as much as a dingo with a baby lunchbox – not very much, that is!”
Key Jiggles from the Didgeridoo
- The Australian federal government is grappling with ‘high risk’ AI products that are evolving speedily, putting Sonic the Hedgehog to shame.
- Australia is considering asking tech companies to label content generated by artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT. They could be little tech tattoos or watermarks, so watch out for some fancy AI tramp stamps.
- The industry and science minister, Ed Husic, is stepping up to the plate. The bloke will release the government’s response to a consultation process on safe and responsible AI in Australia.
- The McKinsey researchers seem to have been busy with their abacuses, throwing around numbers suggesting AI and automation could give Australia’s GDP a vigorous massage to the tune of $600 billion a year. Now, that’s a lot of shrimps on the barbie!
Summing up with a Barbie and a Brew
“Seems like Australia is ready to set some stringent rules for AI babysitting. The proposed water-marking idea definitely sounds doable and is a good first step to knowing when we’re chatting with a bot and when we’re chatting with a person. AI might be moving at a fast pace, but it looks like Aussie lawmakers aren’t afraid to introduce the cyber whippersnappers to a little discipline. Despite the trust issues, it’s also clear that the land of roos and lethal spiders sees the enormous potential of AI and automation’s contribution to its economy, which is pretty bonza. Now let’s see if they can balance the surfboard of innovation with the lifebuoy of regulation. Catchya on the flip side, mates!”
As part of this experiment I would like to give credit where credit is due. If you enjoy these, please take a moment to read the original article:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/17/australia-ai-content-label-chatgpt-tech-companies-law-labor-government-policy
Blog Title
AI: gpt-3.5-turbo-0613: chatcmpl-8heIwrufY4PvAQ6gx3wCAXTjCRHhB
Instruction: “You are an AI blog title generator. Create a catchy and concise title for the blog post that is catchy and optimized for search engines. Remove all html in the response and do not use quotes. Please do not use words that are unsafe to process in Dall-E image AI.”
Prompt: Content Summary of text from above.
Response: Australian Government Responds to Low Public Trust and Pledges Stricter Regulations for “High Risk” AI Products
Image Description
AIgpt-4-0613:chatcmpl-8heJ9uBQ5FGGsLL3UZzXezgbKhgSE
Instruction: “You are a helpful assistant that creates unique images based on article titles. Create a brief visual description of what an image would look like for this title. Please pick a style of art from the following: Futurism, Impressionism, Romanticism, or Realism, be sure to consider the image should reflect an AI Robot Pirate theme during the Golden Age of Pirates.”
Prompt: Drawing from the style of Futurism, the image depicts a sleek robotic hand in the foreground, symbolizing AI. It’s holding a pirate telescope, magnifying the Australian Government’s parliament house as a nod to the “Robotic Pirate” theme. The magnified image of the parliament is filled with golden light, an allusion to the Golden Age of Pirates. In the background, silhouettes of anxious public with question marks above their heads can be seen, demonstrating low public trust. At the same time, a document titled “Stricter AI Regulations” is shown emerging from the parliament, signaling the government’s response.
Response: Australian Government Responds to Low Public Trust and Pledges Stricter Regulations for “High Risk” AI Products
